Luis Pasteur is perhaps mostly known for his proposal that microorganisms were responsible for certain pathologies, which resulted in increasing life expectancy for millions of people. However, he also devised experiments that were decisive in disproving the theory of spontaneous generation. Pasteur became a model of proper experimental methodology, and was a sagacious individual, thoroughly informed about the issues of his time. He understood the potential impact that a naturalistic worldview could have on our vision of reality and remained committed to Christianity.

One often hears of conflict between religion and science or that creationists are anti-science. This article rejects such mindsets and presents another perspective about looking for the good even in people we may disagree with.

Rigorous, collaborative science is needed, while acknowledging human interpretive limits and accepting paradoxes. Faith in Christ, not just evidence, drives belief, and respectful engagement aims to win hearts, blending science and faith to reflect God’s creation.

While studying astronomy at a university with the motto “Sun of Righteousness, shine upon us,” Mart de Groot embraced Christianity, inspired by Psalm 19:1, and began exploring the interplay between science and faith, finding that God’s character traits, such as love, power, and order, are reflected in astronomical phenomena. This article reveals Earth’s creation as a focal point of God’s love for humanity, while catastrophic events like the Flood or solar flares mirror the moral consequences of the Fall.

Only if Christians can be trusted in areas scientists know, will they be trusted in areas scientists don’t know.

Toward the end of my graduate studies in organic chemistry at the University of California, Irvine, the conflict that sometimes arises between science and faith presented itself forcibly to me. The closest friend that I had in a group of about 25 people was a brilliant post-doctoral fellow from Georgia, and we decided to take a day trip to the San Diego Zoo to get away from the pressures of the University.…

In a world drowning in information, there is an even stronger search for ultimate truth. It seems the information age expects each of us to sort out misleading advertisements, internet “facts”, and professionally perpetrated misinformation in our own attempts to determine what is true.

When we are seeking answers, it matters a great deal what questions we ask. That seems obvious, but asking the right questions does not always happen automatically. And one of the important questions is “can I expect to know the answer to this question?” I am especially thinking of questions and answers relating to faith and science: questions about origins and geological history. First of all, consider…

Published in Jiří Moskala, ed., Meeting with God on the Mountains: Essays in Honor of Richard M. Davidson (Berrien Springs, MI: Old Testament Department, Seventh-day Adventist Theological Society, Andrews University, 2016), 683-718.

While the science culture may have become less receptive to belief today, researchers of faith still contribute to the scientific community.

This second part of a series on Christianity and the Development of Science provides additional examples of well-known past scientists whose study of nature came from a desire to know the Creator better. Many of these men were active Christians and held administrative positions in the church. Their study of the Bible led them to view the world in a way that helped them understand nature.

Warfare and conflict are often what come to mind when thinking about the relationship between science and religion. Some of the best known examples are arguably (Gould) the flat earth, the church's resistance to Galileo and his heliocentric system, Darwinian evolution, and the Scope's trial in Dayton, Tennessee.

Science and Scripture are built, according to Boyle, on the same epistemological features of revelation, reason, and experience but with different relative contributions from each.

Newton was an unusual person—absent-minded and generous, sensitive to criticism and modest. He faced a series of psychological crises. He had trouble maintaining good social relations. Yet, he was one of history’s rare giants—a brilliant physicist, a superb astronomer and mathematician, and a natural philosopher.

Long ago, the Psalmist recorded a gem of inspiration: "The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands." Nature calls us to recognize its Creator and nature invites us to probe its mysteries. Within the context of that call and that invitation, there need be no conflict between biblical Christianity and science, between faith and reason. A scientist can indeed be a Christian.