©Copyright 2018 GEOSCIENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE
11060 Campus Street • Loma Linda, California 92350 • 909-558-4548
R. H. Brown
Director, Geoscience Research Institute
Berrien Springs, Michigan
Origins 2(1):6-18 (1975).
It is sometimes proposed that the correlation between C-14 ages and depth as found in peat bogs and sediments demonstrates the validity of the C-14 dating technique. The comprehensive study presented below shows that such a conclusion is not warranted, since, in the great majority of cases, a linear relationship between depth and C-14 concentration does not exist.
In the development of the radiocarbon dating technique, it was
recognized that calibration against an independent method of dating past events was
necessary for conversion of radioactive carbon measurements into real time. After the
development of this technique Dr. Willard Libby was able to demonstrate an approximate
one-to-one correspondence between radiocarbon age and real time over a range extending
from the present into the early part of the second millennium B.C., provided that the
specimen received its carbon from the biosphere during a relatively brief interval of time
and was effectively isolated chemically since that time (Libby 1955). Hl. de Vries, H. E.
Suess, M. Stuiver and Elizabeth Ralph, utilizing dendrochronological techniques,
subsequently led out in the development of refinements for converting C-14 ages into real
time (See Olsson 1970). The work of C. W. Ferguson to extend conversion of C-14 dates over
an additional three millennia to beyond 7000 B.P. ("before the present") using
bristlecone pine wood is well known (Olsson 1970). Excellent conversion charts and graphs
covering the range from A.D. 1800 to 5350 B.C. have been published recently by the
University of Pennsylvania (Ralph et al. 1973).
There is need for a basis on which to interpret radiocarbon ages in excess of 8000 B.P. other than by uncertain extrapolation. Furthermore, the presently available conversion system covering the 4000 to 8000 B.P. range rests on an insecure foundation due to the unique problems of bristlecone pine dendrochronology (insensitivity of growth ring sequences) and the reliance on C-14 dating to establish a master ring chronology which in turn is used to calibrate C-14 ages. Bristlecone pine dendrochronology presently supports the concept that prior to 1000 B.C. the relative C-14 level in Earth's atmosphere was higher than the value that has been maintained with little variation over the past three millennia.
The investigation reported in this paper was undertaken in the hope of making some progress toward a better understanding of the relative C-14 activity in the biosphere during prehistoric times and toward an improved perception of the real time significance that may be attached to C-14 ages.
PEAT AND SEDIMENT PROFILE OBSERVATIONS
Peat bogs (Figure 1) and sediments that involve organic material contain information concerning C-14 activity in the biosphere that covers the entire range of radiocarbon dating to "infinite age." Unfortunately, this information is available only in a relation between two dependent variables. The three-dimensional relationship between radiocarbon age, feature depth and real time can only be seen in projection on the plane in which a C-14 age versus feature depth profile may be displayed. Real time is a hidden variable that extends normal to this plane. Lacking direct data concerning the relationship between either feature depth or C-14 age and real time, we can hope that a study of the empirical relationships between these two dependent variables will enable us to draw some useful and soundly based conclusions concerning the manner in which either of them have related to real time.
FIGURE 1. Section through an ancient peat bog near the town of Sydney Mines, Nova Scotia, Canada. The peat is the darker and thicker layered material which forms the main part of the picture; it rests on lighter colored lithified sediments.
Idealized relationships that may be expected between C-14 age and feature or formation depth are illustrated in Figure 2. In plotting these profiles, I have chosen to present C-14 age on the ordinate axis to emphasize that it is a dependent variable. Plots of C-14 age versus depth can be visually classified as A-type, B-type and C-type. Under strictly uniform conditions an A-type linear profile would be produced. Real-time-dependent changes in the relative C-14 activity of the biosphere or in the rates at which sediments and bogs accumulate could produce profiles of either the B-type (convex toward the depth axis) or the C-type (concave toward the depth axis). Samples of A-, B- and C-type profiles that have been reported in the literature are shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Variants of the C-type are illustrated in Figures 6 and 7. Each point represents the measured value and ± one standard error.
FIGURE 2. PROFILE TYPE ILLUSTRATION. The departure of the extreme age point from a linear relationship is given by d. The C-14 age range over which the deeper portion of the profile departs from linearity is given by g.
FIGURE 3. SAMPLE A-TYPE PROFILE. Torren's Bog (See Table 1).
FIGURE 4. SAMPLE B-TYPE PROFILE. Trummen (See Table 1).
FIGURE 5. SAMPLE C-TYPE PROFILE. Padul IV (See Table 1).
FIGURE 6. VARIANT C-TYPE PROFILE. Selent Lake VI (See Table 1).
FIGURE 7. VARIANT C-TYPE PROFILE. Plöner See (See Table 1).
TABLE I. FEATURE TABULATION
Reference is to Radiocarbon (Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut), volume:page, unless noted otherwise. C-14 Age Range gives the total range in conventional C-14 years (5570 year half-life) of profile data given in the stated reference. Shape Factor is described in connection with Equation 1 of the accompanying text. Asterisk (*) indicates non-linear profile shape based on only one datum point at maximum of age range.
FEATURE REFERENCE C-14 AGE
Hangklip, S. Africa 12:453 360-11,140 0 Red Moss Bog, England 12:592 4,370- 9,798 0 Ballynagilly, Ireland 13:112 695- 9,595 0.23 Tregaron S. E. Bog, Wales 14:240 2,922-10,205 0 Stockbergsmyren, Sweden 9:392 430- 9,280 0 Sur-Les-Bieds, France 9:31 4,430- 9,360 0.14 Kirchner Marsh, Minnesota 5:312 1,660-10,230 0 - 0.17 [0.08] Torren's Bog, Ohio 9:324 420-10,960 0 Hershop Bog, Texas 12:253 1,520-10,920 0
Sacred Lake #3, Kenya 12:448 3,285-33,350 0 Zombepata Cave, Rhodesia
15:550 2,110-37,290 0 Lake Victoria, Uganda
11:600 3,240-14,730 0 - 0.25 [0.12] Kyoto, Japan 15:42 7,050-12,340 0 Lake Zeribar, Iran 11:593 8,100-22,000 0 Belle Lake, Ireland 16:7 5,490-12,235 0 Lake Vuolep Njakojaure,
11:442 2,370- 9,420 0 Selent Lake V, Germany 15:276 106-14,180 0? Round Lake, Indiana 15:361 655- 9,345 0 Myrtle Lake, Minnesota 11:575 2,680-11,120 0 Mediterranean Core 95 15:390 2,835-13,895 0 Middle American Trench,
W. Coast of Mexico
10:270 2,080-11,500 0 Walvis Ridge, S. Atlantic 11:651 4,320-37,000 0
Hallarums Mosse, Sweden 9:404 4,585-10,170 -0.82 S. Mjölstötmyren (B), Sweden 9:389 765- 9,725 -0.72 Trummen, Sweden 10:40 1,130- 9,690 -1.19 Råbacka, Finland 10:269 3,510- 9,430 -1.05 Jewell Bog, Iowa 10:255 2,365-11,640 -1.43 Denmark Bog, New Jersey 9:323 2,290-11,500 -0.53 Boriack, Texas 12:625 3,700-15,460 -0.35 Valle de Laguinillas, Colombia 11:355 6,510-12,320 -2.12
Gandiol, Senegal 16:80 2,000-34,300 -2.37* Lake Nojiri, Japan 11:595 1,530-11,800 -0.42 Timor Sea, Indonesia 9:279 2,320-19,000
-2.16* Trummen, Sweden 10:40; 11:434; 12:535 1,130-11,730 -0.50 Selent Lake #III
15:273 1,300-24,830 -1.11 - 0 [-0.55] Mid-Atlantic Ridge,
11:651 5,940-30,100 -0.92
Altnahinch, Ireland 15:220 1,525- 9,555 0.53 Slieve Gallion, Ireland 13:113 2,670- 9,660 0.54 Sluggan, Ireland 12:296 13:124,454,465 16:272 985-12,360 0.82 Din Moss, Scotland 15:536 5,341-12,251 1.10 Ageröd, Sweden 5:208 430-10,680 1.43 Barsebäckmossen, Sweden 15:496 4,810- 9,640 1.74 Hallviken, Sweden 9:395 1,305- 9,860 0.32 Tisjön, Sweden 5:207 720- 7,630 0.85 Meldorf, W. Germany 9:224 2,690-11,950 1.02 Hanhijänkä, Finland 16:254 1,660- 9,680 0.77 Ayat, Central Ural Mtn.
10:461 3,510- 9,780 0.31 Bog Remmeski, Estonia 13:79 2,560-10,770 1.03 Kalina, Estonia 12:239 1,415- 9,130 0.39 Niederwil, Switzerland 14:43 4,960-12,780 0.45? Padul IV, Spain 14:30 4,980-46,440
1.55 Disterhaft Farm, Wisconsin 13:479 2,850-15,560 0.65 Pretty Lake, Indiana 11:144 920-13,375 0.67 Colo Bog, Iowa 10:255 3,100-13,775 0.64 McCulloch Bog, Iowa 10:258 3,170-14,500 0.46 Woden Bog, Iowa 10:258 2,830-11,570 1.22 Brown's Lake, Ohio 11:145 565-10,915 0.68 Muscotah, Kansas 12:321 5,100-23,040 3.33*
Kaisungor B, Kenya 12:447 765-27,750 2.78 Lake Elmenteita, Kenya 14:120 8,740-29,320 0.51 Lake Victoria, Uganda 11:551 860- 9,550 0.28 Lake Huleh, Israel 11:591 2,480-32,900 0.80 Lake Jih Tan, Taiwan 11:597 4,200-35,500
1.15 Lake Yueh Tan, Taiwan 11:551 1,280- 9,670 0.85 Lake Keilambete, Australia 12:568 610-14,300 1.27 S.W. Australia coast 9:280 5,900-10,000
0 - 1.90 [0.95] Blea Tarn, England 15:557 4,476- 9,872 0.38 Nant Ffrancon, Wales 15:157 4,256-10,080 0.60 Lake Vuolep Njakajaure,
11:443 2,410- 8,980 0.65* Ranviken Bay, Sweden 11:431
750-12,670 1.06 Striern, Sweden 12:541 740-12,090 1.03 Könkäänlampi, Finland 16:254 1,660- 9,680 1.18 Lake Pappilanlampi, Finland 11:68 9,200-20,800 2.06 - 2.26 [2.16] Dolni Véstonice, Czechoslovakia
0.86? Plöner See, N.W. Germany 13:327 1,140-10,810 2.55 Segeberger See, N.W. Germany 12:528 1,890-12,690 0.52 Selent Lake #I, N.W. Germany 15:272 380-10,170 1.74 Selent Lake #IV 15:274 920-17,390 2.16 Selent Lake #VI 15:276 780-30,930 3.90 Boniger See #I, Switzerland 12:367 6,030-10,430 1.20 Boniger See #2 12:367 2,700- 8,370 0.85 Charcot Seamount,
0.36 Golf du Lion, France
15:324,328 6,900-31,500 1.14 Longetray, France
15:524 4,640-12,720 0.59? Venice composite, Italy Nature 244:339 5,000-46,000 2.03 Antifreeze Pond, Alaska 13:302 5,690-29,700
1.05 Lake Hill, Alaska 11:563 2,620-17,800 1.25 - 1.76 [1.50] Lofty Lake, Alberta 13:289 3,460-11,400 0.58 Lake Quassapaug, Connecticut 11:567 1,020-12,330 0 - 0.76 [0.38] Rogers Lake, Connecticut 11:550 630-10,510 0.80 Berry Pond, Massachusetts 15:360 995-12,680 1.30 Bog D, Minnesota 11:576 2,720-11,000 0.98 Rutz Lake, Minnesota 11:573 1,100-12,000 0.40 Kalaloch, Washington 11:579 16,700-42,700
1.34 Rockyhock Bay, N. Carolina 15:360 6,655-25,020 2.12 Singletary Lake, N. Carolina 10:263 5,750-35,800
1.11 Blake Plain C-19, W. Atlantic 15:393 4,130-15,995 1.53 Campeche Bank, Yucatan 9:314
To make the analysis of a large number of features as objective as
possible, a quantitative description of feature profile is necessary. The ordinary
mathematical description of curvature would be useful only for profiles that are a
straight line or a segment of a circle. A shape factor designation that has been found
useful describes the profile in terms of the departure of the extreme end point (maximum
age) from a linear relationship. As depicted in Figure 2, we set d
equal to the amount by which the C-14 age for the extreme end point departs from a linear
relationship. The C-14 age range over which the extreme age portion of the profile is
non-linear is represented by g. This construction assumes that
a straight line can be satisfactorily fitted to the data points for a more recent portion
of the feature.
The profile shape factor S may then be defined as a logarithmic function given by Equation 1.
S = ln (1 + d/g) Equation 1
- S = 0 for strict A-type profiles,
- -¥ < S < 0 for the B-type profile range of possibility,
- 0 < S < +¥ for the C-type profile range of possibility.
Data for the features that have been included in this study are presented in Table 1. This listing contains all significant localities that have well-established profile trends to or beyond 9000 B.P. as given in Radiocarbon, volumes 8-16 (1966-1974; volume 16, number 3 is not included), and selected features from volume 5. Also included is a summary of data for the Venice coastal region that were published in Nature, volume 244 (1973). Since a subjective element is involved in curve plotting and determination of appropriate values for d and g, individuals who may wish to check this data should not expect to always agree precisely with the author's selection of shape factor. Cases for which significant uncertainties exist are indicated in Table 1. An effort has been made to bias shape factor determinations toward zero (straight-line type profile) while being open-minded toward non-zero possibilities so that any conclusion reached will be trustworthy.
ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS
The profile shape factors from Table 1 are plotted in Figure 8. In this plot, shape factors have been grouped within ranges 0.25 shape factor units in width. Thus all shape factors between +1.00 and +1.24 are plotted in the first column to the right of +1. Those between +1.25 and +1.49 are plotted in the next column. All profiles for which -0.24 < S < +0.24 have been classified as A-type; and all profiles visually judged to be satisfactorily described by a straight line have been assigned a shape factor of zero and arbitrarily plotted between -0.25 and +0.25. According to this convention any profile for which -0.22 < (d/g) < +0.28 is considered to be A-type, i.e., departure of the extreme age point from a linear relationship is within approximately one-fourth the C-14 age range of the curved portion of the extreme age section of the profile.
FIGURE 8. PROFILE SHAPE FACTOR SUMMARY. Number of profile shape factors failing within a given integral range 0.25 shape factor units in width. Profiles visually judged to be best represented by a straight line (A-type) are arbitrarily plotted between -0.25 and +0.25.
¯ Median for range of uncertainty
( ) Questionable, may be A-type
Table 1 contains 98 features. Of these 22 or 22.4% have A-type
profiles, 13 or 13.3% have B-type profiles, and 63 or 64.3% are C-type. The average shape
factor for these profiles is 0.60 (within the third column between 0 and +1 of
Figure 8), which corresponds to an average d/g value of
0.82. Since the features for which this average has been computed do not all have an
identical C-14 age range nor inflection at the same C-14 age, a quantitative
interpretation of this average is uncertain. The value 0.82 is large enough to positively
rule out compaction as the primary cause for the predominance of C-type profiles.
It seems to be clearly established that the predominant tendency is for ancient peat bogs and sediments to have a C-type profile. The various possibilities for profile development are given an idealized representation in Figure 9. A constant relative C-14 level in the biosphere and a uniform rate of accumulation will produce a perfect A-type profile, as shown in the upper left corner of Figure 9. Opposing changes in the C-14 activity level and the rate of accumulation can also fortuitously combine to produce an A-type profile, as indicated at the right of the second row and in the center of the third row of Figure 9. A C-type profile is seen to be the result of an increasing rate of formation, an increasing level of C-14 activity in the environment, or a combination of increase in both factors.
FIGURE 9. PROFILE INTERPRETATION GUIDE.
Explanation in terms of an increasing rate of formation accumulation
for the 64% tendency toward C-type profiles found in this study requires conditions that
were relatively unfavorable, on the average, for peat bog growth and sediment accumulation
(erosion) over the time covered by C-14 ages ranging between approximately 5000 B.P. and
in the order of 30,000 B.P. The requisite conditions are a warm, dry climate or an arctic
climate. Such conditions are not in accord with prevailing concepts concerning glaciation
and ancient climate (Flint 1971); nor are they in accord with deductions concerning the
probable consequences of a recent world-wide flood. These considerations, combined with
recognition of the extremely steep early portions of those peat bog and sediment profiles
that extend to the 30,000 and 40,000 B.P. regions, suggest explanation predominantly in
terms of an increase in the relative C-14 level of the biosphere. This explanation also
contributes to a rational basis for harmonizing C-14 ages with the chronological
implications of the first eleven chapters of Genesis.
The existence of A- and B-type profiles for periods which are predominantly characterized by C-type may be accounted for as the consequence of local situations in which the initial rate of bog growth or sediment accumulation was so rapid as to counteract or overbalance, respectively, the effect of increasing C-14 activity on the feature profile. Such conditions may be expected during a period of cool pluviatile climate, particularly when vegetation is being reestablished.
The suggestion that the specific C-14 activity in the biosphere was increasing as a general trend during prehistoric time is reinforced by Figure 10. In this figure over 10,000 radiocarbon age determinations that were reported between 1950 and 1965 are plotted versus centuries of C-14 age. Although it may be argued that the C-14 dating results available by the end of 1965 contain a representative sampling of the entire age range, it also should be recognized that accessibility and archaeological interests probably have favored a disproportionate collection of recent and intermediate dates. With due allowance for such possible bias, Figure 10 indicates plateaus in the availability of C-14 dates over the C-14 age ranges of 30,000-14,000 and 12,000-6,000.
FIGURE 10. FREQUENCY OF SAMPLES AS A FUNCTION OF C-14 AGE. Data from "Radiocarbon Measurements: Comprehensive Index, 1950-1965," E. S. Deevey, R. F. Flint, I. Rouse, eds., Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, 1967. Plot courtesy Dr. H. C. Sorensen.
These plateaus could indicate periods of rapid increase in the
specific C-14 activity of the biosphere. During such periods the average specific C-14
activity of organisms at death would be constantly increasing, with production of a
smaller number of specimens with a given initial activity level than would be the case
under a constant level of C-14 activity. For such specimens a ±50 year "window"
in present measurement of residual activity would correspond with only a few years or
possibly months during growth. Accordingly, the representation in Figure 10 could indicate
rapid increase in the biosphere C-14 activity level during the period corresponding to
30,000-14,000 C-14 years, less rapid increase in this level over the period corresponding
to 12,000-6,000 C-14 years, and approximate constancy of this level over the past 3,000
years (as confirmed by historical and dendrochronological calibration). Transitions would
occur during the intervening periods.
A rapidly increasing C-14 activity level in the supporting environment also accounts for the anomalous C-14 ages associated with the Chekurovka mammoth 26,000 for hair and 5,610 for overlying peat (Radiocarbon 8:320, 321); the Fairbanks Creek musk ox 24,000 for scalp muscle tissue and 17,200 for hair (Radiocarbon 12:203); the Union Pacific mammoth 11,300 for most recently formed ivory and 5,000 for wood fragments in the surrounding gravel (Radiocarbon 8:172, 173); and the Ferguson Farm mastodon 8,900 for bone collagen and 6,200 for gyttja from within skull cavities (Radiocarbon 10:216).
The data covered in this report do not support the 10% decrease in biosphere C-14 activity level required by the currently accepted bristlecone pine master chronology between 5500 B.P. and 2500 B.P., unless it can be established that there has been a preponderant tendency for increased rates of sediment accumulation and bog growth over the past 5,000 years. This conclusion gains greater force on a detailed examination of the individual profiles listed in Table 1 (the g region of one-half the C-type profiles listed begins between approximately 5000 and 10,000 B.P., with one-fourth beginning below and one-fourth beginning above this range).
A general trend of increasing biosphere C-14 specific activity levels over the range of real time covered by C-14 ages between 40,000 and 5000 B.P. is strongly indicated, if not well established, by this study. Consequently C-14 ages in the prehistoric range should be expected to be progressively in excess of the real time involved.
Further refinement and expanded development on the suggestions contained in this report should prove fruitful. For example, it would be desirable to determine the average profile trends for various geographical regions and for various portions of the C-14 age range.
- Flint, R. F. 1971. Glacial and quaternary geology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. (Specifically chapter 16).
- Libby, W. F. 1955. Radiocarbon dating, 2nd edition. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Olsson, I. U., editor. 1970. Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology. Wiley Interscience Division, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
- Ralph, E. K., Michael, H. N., and Han, M. C. 1973. Radiocarbon dates and reality. MASCA Newsletter 9(1). Applied Science Center for Archaeology, University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
NOTE (1/30/2000): In the original publication Trummen was incorrectly listed as a peat bog. It is a B-Type Profile lake sediment. References: 10:40; 11:434; 12:535. C-14 Age Range: 1,130-11,730. Profile Shape Factor: -0.50. Its designation in Figure 8 should be changed from a filled circle in the fifth column left of zero to an X two columns closer toward zero.
Front cover: View of Chase Lake on the northern outskirts of Seattle, Washington. In the process of bog formation, which is taking place here, subsurface peat is accumulating to various depths along the edge of the lake. For further discussion of the relation of peat formation to carbon-14 dating, see the article by R. H. Brown on page 6.
Cnidarian Venom Evolution: Nothing New Under the Sun
Cnidarians appear to have recruited as toxins the same kinds of proteins recruited by many other venomous animals. However, toxin diversity within groups of organisms does not appear to be related to the alleged evolutionary history of the various groups.