
Origins 2(2):98-99 (1975).
NEWS AND COMMENTS
In May 1975, the citizens of California and the State Board of
Education faced another round in the controversy over the teaching of creation in the
public schools.
On May 8 a public hearing was held in Sacramento, at which time
interested parties could present their opinions on some of the textbooks that were being
proposed for use in the public schools for 1976 to 1981. Most of the 67 speakers, in their
allotted 5 minutes, addressed their remarks to one of two issues: the treatment of
minorities or the teaching of creation.
After the public hearing in November 1972, the State Board had voted
not to include creation in the science textbooks, but to discuss the creation and
evolution theories in the social science texts. A perusal of the social science texts
chosen for adoption by the Curriculum Commission made it evident that they had chosen to
ignore the Board's decision and had not approved any books which included both creation
and evolution.
Dr. John R. Ford, President of the State Board of Education, opened the
hearing by reporting a record number of petition signatures and letters urging the
inclusion of creation material "the greatest number I have ever received on
any measure." He continued by stating, "I think it's fair to say that to date
the members of this Board have received a total of about two hundred thousand letters,
telegrams, cards, signatures, or other indications of public opinion about the teaching of
evolution and creation."
Concluding that the Board had a mandate in this regard because of the
expressions of opinion, Dr. Ford urged: "According to the framework we have adopted,
the various views of human origins must be seen as part of the total intellectual culture.
The publishers have blatantly omitted any presentation of both sides as we requested them.
None of the books up for adoption contain creationist materials.... We have Curriculum
Commission members who do not follow the Board's directions. They are acting as
independent agents. We must follow the framework."
In the public hearing that occupied the remainder of the day, 16 of the
speakers addressed themselves to the creation issue. The tone of this hearing was in sharp
contrast to the 1972 hearing (see ORIGINS 1:29-34). At that time the press lined the side
of the room with cameras as about half of the speakers urged the teaching of both creation
and evolution, and the other half argued that only evolution should be taught. In the 1975
hearing, the press was not very conspicuous, and the anti-creationists did not bother to
come. Of the 16 speakers who spoke directly to the issue of creation and evolution, all
were in favor of including creation in the textbooks.
In spite of the petitions, letters, and speeches, the Board did not
vote to include any creation material in the list of accepted books. The vote was 5 to 5,
one vote short of the majority needed to pass any motion. Three of those who voted against
creation teaching were recently appointed by Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Some creationist groups are now threatening court action or other legal
means of pursuing the issue. Dr. Ford indicated privately that one problem is the lack of
quality material on creation that would be acceptable for public schools. Another problem
is less obvious to the casual observer. At the time of the Scopes Trial (1925) the
evolutionists were contending that academic freedom demanded that evolution should be
taught. Now that the tables are turned and the people of California want both creation and
evolution to be taught, evolutionists are fighting this. Perhaps academic freedom is not
the real issue in their minds, and one wonders if there isn't a concerted effort to
eliminate a competing theory. The outcome of this session also makes one wonder about the
usefulness of public hearings, since it appears that several of the members of the State
Board of Education chose to ignore the desires of their constituents who support the
public schools. A survey in the largest elementary school district in California (see
ORIGINS 2:42-43) indicates that a vast majority of the citizens of California want both
creation and evolution taught. This survey also suggests that more people in California
believe in creation than in evolution.
All contents copyright
Geoscience Research Institute. All rights reserved.
| Home
| About Us
| Contact Us
|
Send comments and questions to
webmaster@grisda.org
| What's New
| Resources
| Search
| Links
|