NOTE: This document is for personal use only. It is not to be distributed in either print or electronic format.
Lee A. Spencer
Earth History Research Center, Southwestern Adventist University
M. Elaine Kennedy
Geology, Geoscience Research Institute
FOR: Faith and Science Conference, Glacier View Ranch, CO August 2003
ABSTRACT
The earliest attempts at explaining the rock record
involved diluvial interpretations. Today, naturalistic interpretations have
almost completely replaced diluvial ones. Order in the geological column is
directly observable and well tested. With few exceptions, modern debate centers
not on the existence of order, but what has caused it.
The biostratigraphic relationships of fossils preserve very
detailed stratigraphic ranges where many taxa first appear then disappear at
staggered intervals relative to each other. This forms the basis for relative
geologic time intervals. Similar patterns of first and last appearances for the
same taxa are often observed in completely different basins. These similar
patterns form the basis for correlation. Strata in different basins sharing the
same fossil taxa are interpreted to have formed at the same time.
Naturalistic interpretations for the staggered ranges of
fossils are usually evolutionary with invoked migrations. Tests of evolutionary
hypotheses based on observed biostratigraphic data are almost universally
falsified. This has led to the development of alternate views on how evolution
must work such as punctuated equilibrium or the use of ad hoc statements
on the incompleteness of the fossil record.
With the birth of neodiluvialism, a new model was proposed to
explain the observed order in the fossil record. Originally called Ecological
Zonation, it postulated that as the waters of Noah’s Flood rose, they came upon
a sequence of biomes that were destroyed and buried in the order encountered.
The processes of identifying and correlating biomes are strictly analogous to
the processes used to define relative geological time.
The choice between a neodiluvial and an evolutionary one is a
cosmological decision. The data can be interpreted either way with neither
viewpoint remaining unfalsified. The acceptance of one or the other position is
based largely upon faith.